The participation of the Republic of Lithuania in international organizations is usually successfully coordinated, about which the necessary normative legal acts are adopted in advance.
So, for example, in accordance with the Resolution Government of Republic of Lithuania No. 565 of 21 September 2016 "On the implementation of the provisions of regulation (EC) No. 1005/2009 of the European parliament and of the Council of approval of 16 September 2009" On substances that deplete the ozone layer "18 May 2011 [2]" 4. Delegate: 4.1.2. coordinating the implementation of the Regulation, programs and plans for the management of ODS in cooperation with other ministries of the Republic of Lithuania and state authorities, providing advice to the ministries of the Republic of Lithuania and other state bodies on the regulation of ODS”.
As you can see, the coordination mechanism in this example is clear and concise. However, we observe a completely different situation in the “internal” coordination regulation.
For example, on the basis of Resolution Government of Republic of Lithuania No. 1328 "On approval of the program for improving energy efficiency of public buildings" [2], which was adopted in pursuance of the agreements of Lithuania due to its participation in international organizations, Article 24 deals with the approval measures to coordinate investment policy in the construction of buildings and structures for public needs. It is noted that here, too, coordination helps to avoid corruption.
At the same time, according to Article 34, “the organizers of projects for investments in municipal public buildings are municipal executive bodies, which, in order to improve the energy efficiency of public buildings under the jurisdiction of the property, carry out the following activities:
34.2. coordination of the prospects for the use of the selected public building in accordance with its purpose with the ministry in the relevant area of competence, taking into account the purpose of using the public building”.
In this case, there is no clear coordination regulation. The coordination process itself is not defined in any way from the point of view of its procedure. The subjective composition of such activities remains unclear. Questions of responsibility for failure to comply with the agreed decision remained unanswered.
We believe that such a difference in the quality of coordination norms of law according to the same survey is due to the high assessment by the Government of Lithuania of the potential results of the participation of representatives of the republic in international organizations. However, the internal “consumer” of coordination legal norms must also be provided with high-quality coordination legal norms.
Literature:
1. Resolution Government of Republic of Lithuania № 565 от 21 September 2016 «On the implementation of the provisions of regulation (EC) № 1005/2009 of the European parliament and of the Council of approval of 16 September 2009 «On substances that deplete the ozone layer» 18 May 2011 // https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/en/TAD/289c75c0d25e11e6a476d5908abd2210
2. Resolution Government of Republic of Lithuania № 1328 «On approval of the programme for improving energy efficiency of public buildings» // https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/en/TAD/89076b10978811e68adcda1bb2f432d1
|
Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Знайшли помилку? Виділіть помилковий текст і натисніть Ctrl + Enter
