In the legislation on culture and sports of the Netherlands, coordination legal technology is used quite widely [1; 121]
Culture moves [2] details the situation with the coordination of actions in the sports sphere, provides for coordination activities, touches upon the issues of their financing, etc., which, unfortunately, is not the case in Russian practice.
In particular, it notes that “in the past few months we have entered into various agreements with local and provincial authorities based on our shared responsibility for the cultural infrastructure of the Netherlands and in an effort to coordinate our different policies at different levels ... One possible system of cooperation between sports by organizations and cultural organizations consists of “combined appointments” that ensure better coordination between Olympic and external sports and cultural events. We will continue to support these combined meetings ... This money will be added to the funds available in the RAAK (Regional Action for Knowledge Innovation) funding scheme, which will be allocated by the new coordinating body operating within the Netherlands Research Organization (NWO) … Therefore, we are preparing a bill regulating cooperation and coordination between the national digital library and the physical library facilities. We have asked the Cultural Council to study the bill and hope to submit it to the Chamber in the fall ... We believe we can greatly simplify the funding application process and also ensure coordination between national authorities and other levels of government. We need to rethink how we work with local government. We believe that state cultural policies would be more meaningful if they were more closely coordinated with local, regional and national policies. The large municipalities and the Association of Dutch Municipalities agree with us in this regard. The advisory system can also be streamlined and better coordinated, leading to a simpler administrative system. ”
In this case, counseling can act as a form of coordination, as we have already written earlier [3; 114].
At the same time, it should be noted that there are some shortcomings in this part in the law of the Netherlands. We attribute the following to the disadvantages of using coordination regulation.
First, coordination norms are not used in all possible spheres of constitutional regulation. For example, they are almost absent in the norms governing the activities of local government. There are no such norms in the sphere of interaction between local self-government and state authorities, which is a significant drawback of Russian coordination regulation. Secondly, laws often indicate that an official or a government body has coordination powers, but it is not clear in what form they can be implemented. It is clear that the entire regulation mechanism cannot be reflected in the country's constitution, however, for the majority of high-ranking officials it would be desirable, in our opinion, as we have already written earlier.
Literature:
1. A.A. Maksurov Coordination in legal systems of the countries of Europe. Part I. Monograph - M.: Rusays, 2018.- 544 p.
2. Culture moves // https://www.government.nl/documents/letters/ 2013/10/15/culture-moves
3. Maksurov A.A. The main characteristics of the coordination legal technique // Actual problems of the theory and history of the legal system of society: Sat. scientific. tr. / resp. ed. V.N. Kartashov. Yaroslavl, 2012. Issue. 11. - S. 114-121.
|
Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Знайшли помилку? Виділіть помилковий текст і натисніть Ctrl + Enter
